When I criticize Fox News for being biased, I frequently get the response from avid Fox watchers that Fox is not biased, it is in fact objective, especially as compared to the liberally slanted “lamestream” media.
But then there’s stuff like this article about the sequester. The article actually states: “Republicans want to replace the current regime of cuts with different, more sensible, cuts.”
Huh? Now keep in mind, this is a news article, not opinion. Last time I heard, the Republican version of “sensible” involved going after Social Security and Medicare as a first priority. Going after the elderly, sick and disabled, who already don’t have very much, is not sensible. Especially if you refuse to consider any other sources of revenue.
And just as importantly, saying that one party is “more sensible” than the other is clearly opinion and bias. I can’t imagine a news source like the BBC, for instance, injecting a phrase like this into their reporting, without it being a quote from somebody else. I can imagine MSNBC using this kind of wording, but then I’m fully willing to admit that MSNBC is biased in the liberal direction–that’s why I enjoy watching them so much.
Perhaps those who watch Fox should also be able to admit that it’s not objective and that is why they love it.